Northern Fury

An Alternative Cold War History

The Soviet Carriers.

02 September, 2018 | General News

undefined

The Soviet Navy was late to the game when it comes to using aircraft carriers or, as they were called to bypass the "Montrose Convention," and perhaps more accurately, "Aviation Cruisers." In previous blogs we discussed how US Aircraft Carriers form the core of that country's power projection and global influence strategy, as well as how the smaller NATO Carriers fill many roles which free up the Americans behemoths from many minor tasks. Here we will focus on the Soviet use of carriers to fulfill even different roles.

undefined


Soviet carriers were not built for power projection. For this the Soviet Navy relied upon Long Range Aviation (LRA) and submarines. For the first 30 years of the Cold war the purpose of Soviet surface forces were largely to protect these two major strike arms, both by missile attacks against NATO forces and by Anti-Submarine Warfare (ASW). Keeping NATO forces at arm’s length from Soviet bases and SSBN Bastions, particularly the Kola Peninsula and Barents Sea, was key to protecting the Soviet Union's ability to strike mortal blows when required. In the late ‘70s the surface forces' role started to evolve; if the missile and ASW forces were to survive long enough to protect the bastions, they needed air cover.

undefined
Soviet carrier-based aviation had two basic roles: firstly as flagship of ASW task groups similar to their European NATO adversaries, and secondly to provide air to air cover for ASW and missile task groups. Although ship-borne aviation could perform limited strike tasks, that was purely a secondary role. With the introduction of the larger Kuznetzov-class the Soviets laid the groundwork for an expansion of the air-to-air role, in which carrier aviation would provide escort for LRA strikes. However, such missions would only be possible under specific circumstances.

undefined
The design of the Soviet carriers then was somewhat unique. In addition to carrying aircraft, these ships act as strike cruisers as well, carrying powerful sensors, a capable ASW capability, and a formidable anti-surface and anti-aircraft arsenal. Below is a rundown of the various Soviet carrier classes: 

undefined

Moskva-class

The two ships of the Moskva-class class were the Soviet Navy’s first foray into large Aviation Cruisers and it was, unfortunately for them, not a good effort. Limited by poor reliability and apparently worse sea keeping properties, these ship were eventually tied to the Mediterranean, where the generally calm weather would suit their capacity better. The design of the Moskva-class was also evolutionary, lacking the long range anti-air or anti-surface missiles of their successors. The Soviet Navy learned many very hard lessons with this class. However, for Command and Control (C2) duties on extended cruises and to lead an ASW task group, these ships were far better than anything else on offer in the 1960’s, when they first appeared. The ability to carry 18 helicopters and provide maintenance facilities for the other helicopters in the fleet was a major improvement for far flung task groups. In Northern Fury, as in the historical world, both ships are members of the Black Sea Fleet and are in the Mediterranean at war start; Moskva off the coast of Syria and Leningrad near Tripoli Libya.

undefined

Kiev-class

These ships are the most recognized and probably the most successful examples of Soviet Aviation Cruisers. The four ships of the class are distributed evenly between the North and Pacific Fleets and represent a substantial leap in technology, doctrinal development and capability over the Moskva’s. When built, their 44,000 tons was far larger than anything else in the Soviet Navy, even the nuclear powered Kirov-class Battlecruisers. In addition to carrying more than a dozen helicopters, this class introduced fixed wing VTOL (Vertical Take Off and Landing) aircraft to the Soviet air groups.

undefined

The Yak-38 Forger was not nearly as capable as its contemporary, the Sea Harrier. However, the 20 examples held on board the Kiev class gave Soviet Commanders something they had never had before: ready and available air power. The main armament of these ships, however, was their missile battery, composed of 16 long range P-500 Bazalt (SS-N-12 Sandbox, 4 twin launchers and a full reload) and over 100 short and medium range SAMs (Surface to Air Missiles). The missiles, combined with an impressive C2 and ASW suite, was let down by the poor performance of the Yak-38, which was unable to fulfill the air protection task. Indeed many felt that this class of ship did not properly fit into its assigned role at all, since it tried to do too many things in one hull. However, Northern Fury being an alternative history has some licence to change history, and in our world the Yak-141 Freestyle has reached production status and has joined the fleet in small numbers. You will find the Kiev and the much improved Baku operating in the Red Banner Northern Fleet, while Minsk and Novorossiysk operate out of Vladivostok in the Pacific.

undefined

undefined

Kuznetzov-class

Far closer to the classic aircraft carrier, the Kuznetzov is still, at it heart, an Aviation Cruiser. Armed with a dozen P-700 Granit (SS-N-19 Shipwreck) anti ship missiles in vertical launch tubes and over 250 short and medium range SAMs, the ship's air group could almost be considered secondary. In ,Northern Fury as in the real world, the Admiral Kuznetzov is based in the Northern Fleet. His sister ship, the Varyag,was launched in the Crimea in 1988, and towed to Murmansk in 1992. At the start of the war the Varyag is apparently still being completed.

undefined

The air wing of this carrier has been in flux since it was launched, mostly because carrier aircraft development started to lag in the late ‘80s and early ‘90s. Several aircraft, including the MiG-29K, and the Su-33, are far superior to any other Soviet ship-borne aircraft to date. Despite these new airframes, and even with the Yak-38, Yak-141, and Su-25UTG (for training) embarked, Soviet naval air groups were always a disappointing mix both in numbers capability. In Northern Fury, some of these problems are wished away; the Su-33 was developed on time and in adequate numbers while the MiG-29K proved a capable ground attack platform. Although the standard air group may change over the course of the Northern Fury campaign, at the outbreak of the war the Admiral Kuznetzov carries the following:

undefined

So, in summary, the Soviet carriers were designed generally as support platforms to defend surface and submarine forces, rather than to act as the heart of power-projecting strike groups. However, countries rarely get to fight the wars they wish in the ways they intend, and these platforms find new roles and unexpected strengths in Northern Fury, though their weaknesses and eccentricities remain as well.